27Jan99 USA: MICRORADIO TO ALLOW THOUSANDS OF NEW SMALL
STATIONS
By Aaron Pressman
WASHINGTON, Jan 27 (Reuters) - When Federal regulators shut down the
student-run radio station at the University of Wisconsin's giant Madison campus
in 1993, the school's radio jocks decided to go legit and get a proper license
from the Federal Communications Commission.
But
almost six years later and long after securing an FCC license, the campus
airwaves remain silent. To meet the FCC's minimum requirements and avoid
interference with other stations, the school had to build a huge tower and
neighbors filed a lawsuit to block construction.
"We
don't want to pick a fight," said Dave Black, general manager of the
school's would-be radio station. "If there was a lower power alternative
it would release us from some of these requirements and we wouldn't need the
big tower."
And with
more and more radio stations falling into the hands of a few mega-broadcasting
companies, Wisconsin undergrads are hardly the only would-be radio broadcasters
thwarted by current FCC rules.
Hundreds
of churches, small town governments and budding radio entrepreneurs would love
to go on the air but lack the money to build a full-power station or find their
local airwaves already jammed to capacity.
To ease
the crunch, the FCC on Thursday will propose a new class of "micro"
FM radio stations operating at 1,000 watts or less, compared to the current
minimum license of 6,000 watts. (The agency sometimes makes exceptions and
approves lower power stations, but only if a station could theoretically boost
its power to 6,000 watts and still not cause interference.)
Higher
power boosts the distance a station's signals travel but also boosts the
expense of buying equipment and increases the chance of interfering with
near-by outlets.
FCC
officials promise micro stations will be much cheaper to set up and run than
existing stations while still reaching people in a 20 mile or less diameter.
Even a tiny one watt station can reach listeners in a two mile diameter.
That's
music to the ears of small town high school principal Kevin McGaughey.
There
are no local radio station in Brookland, Arkansas - population 1,100.
McGaughey, who majored in communications, wanted to start a station at
his school to give the students a way to pick up broadcasting skills and also
serve the community by airing local news and information.
"There are kids who don't have an interest in band or sports and
this might just get their interest," McGaughey said. "And it would
not only allow kids to learn about broadcasting but also be a good community
service."
Thrilled
by the FCC's upcoming proposal, McGaughey and other have formed a group called
the Low Power Radio Coalition to show support for micro radio.
FCC
chairman William Kennard, who specialized in broadcast law before coming to the
agency, has championed micro radio as a way of broadening the spectrum of
viewpoints on the air and getting more women and minorities into the industry
as well.
The FCC will
take comments on its proposal before considering a final micro radio plan, a
process that could take anywhere from a few months to a year or more.
And the
plan will be opposed by the broadcasting industry, which says a plethora of
small, new stations are unneeded and likely to cause interference with larger
stations.
"We
don't support the idea," said Dennis Wharton, spokesman for the National
Association of Broadcasters. "Shoe-horning thousands of additional radio
stations into an already crowded airwaves will result in more interference and
less service for radio listeners."
The FCC
will review comments on the interference issue and could scale back the plan,
but with its own engineers backing the proposal and strong support from the
chairman, micro radio boosters are optimistic.
"We
think we can work together to come up with a model that works," said
Michael Bracy, executive director of the low power coalition. "There are
engineering questions but they don't really go to the potential benefits."
((Aaron
Pressman, Washington newsroom, 202-898-8312))
(C) Reuters Limited 1998.