Arizona Firm Cited by Spitzer Had
Run-Ins With Bank Regulators
2003-09-22 00:35 (New York)
Sept. 22 (Bloomberg) -- In 2002, Security
Trust Co. chief
executive Grant Seeger was honored as
Arizona's Entrepreneur of
the Year in financial services for
creating one of the largest
independent trust and custody companies
in the U.S.
The Phoenix firm, founded by Seeger in
1991, processes buy-
and-sell orders in retirement plans,
offering investment advisers
an electronic platform for trading as
many as 5,000 funds in 200
mutual fund-companies, according to its
Web site.
``He had great vision for his company,''
said Kent Mueller,
a Phoenix businessman who voted to
recognize Seeger, 41, as the
top entrepreneur because of Security
Trust's rapid growth.
Now Security Trust has received unwanted
recognition: New
York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer
said the firm enabled -- and
profited from -- illegal after-hours
trading by hedge fund Canary
Capital Partners LLC. The trades were
so profitable that ``STC
ultimately demanded, and received, a
percentage of Canary's
winnings,'' according to Spitzer's
complaint against Canary.
Canary's managing principal, Edward Stern,
who paid a $40
million penalty to settle the civil
case, is cooperating in a
widening investigation of the $6.9
trillion mutual-fund
industry's trading practices. A former
Bank of America Corp.
broker was charged with criminal counts
of grand larceny and
securities fraud for his dealings with
Stern.
Security Trust, which hasn't been charged,
became a
``partner'' to Stern in 2000, Spitzer
said; the company said
revenue rose 56 percent to $16.4
million in 2001, soared 70
percent to $27.7 million last year --
and jumped to $20 million
in the six months ended June 30.
Processing Trades
Security Trust denies wrongdoing and is
``cooperating'' in
the investigation, said Seeger.
``Canary was one of thousands of
clients,'' he said in a telephone
interview. ``We don't manage
money. We only process transactions.''
Arizonans expressed surprise over the
alleged role of
Seeger's company in what Spitzer called
``illegal trading
schemes'' that siphoned millions from
mutual fund investors. ``I
don't see how he could be involved in
something like that,'' said
Mueller, a Phoenix venture capitalist.
``He seemed like a stand-
up person.''
The fund industry relies on so-called
intermediaries like
Security Trust to process electronic
trades and keep records of
the transactions of thousands of banks,
financial advisers and
small brokerages.
Mutual funds are priced once a day, and
all trades made
before 4 p.m. are supposed to get that
day's closing price. To
give intermediaries time to pool
together orders, fund companies
often let them submit trades after the
close of U.S. markets.
Spitzer alleged Security Trust allowed
Canary to slip in trades
until 9 p.m. to take advantage of
late-breaking news.
Violations
``It's a system that has grown over the
years for brokers to
submit their trades to the funds,''
said David Ruder, a former
Securities and Exchange Commission
chairman. ``It's a positive
economic function. The question is how
to prevent abuse.''
Eaton Vance Corp., a Boston-based mutual
funds manager, said
it's investigating if any shareholders
were harmed by trades
processed through Security Trust.
``There's no way for us to know
that, other than to rely on firms like
STC to honor their
obligation,'' said James Hawkes, Eaton
Vance's chief executive.
It's not the first time Seeger or Security
Trust have run
afoul of regulators. The Arizona State
Banking Department has
censured the firm and its chief executive
three times since 1995
for harming investors by putting funds
into inappropriate
investments.
In 1999, the banking authorities said
Security Trust failed
to fulfill its duties as a trust,
shifted poorly performing
securities between accounts, bought
risky securities for clients,
and kept inadequate records. The firm
paid a $50,000 fine.
`Unsafe and Unsound'
In August 1995, Arizona bank examiners
found that Security
Trust had a ``capital shortage'' of
$686,394. Among other
infractions, the company commingled
corporate and fiduciary
accounts and violated trust company
statutes by ``failing to
adequately disclose to clients the
investment of their fiduciary
funds in speculative real estate investments,''
the state banking
department said.
Three years later, the Arizona department
said Security
Trust was in violation of its earlier
``cease-and-desist'' order.
The firm now was ``acting in an unsafe
and unsound manner'' by
putting more than $6.5 million of
client funds into ``highly
speculative'' investments, according to
the complaint.
The company extended its ``pattern of
misrepresentation and
concealment'' to include the state
banking department as well as
clients, the Arizona officials said.
Security Trust also failed
to exercise due diligence by making
complicated transactions that
involved offshore funds or real estate,
the examiners ruled.
Conflicts?
In addition, ``Seeger misrepresented''
Security Trust's
involvement in soliciting fiduciary
clients to invest in what
turned out to be non-performing natural
gas wells in Texas, the
bank examiners said.
Security Trust also placed client funds
with promoters who'd
been charged with securities fraud and
racketeering by the state
attorney general, according to the
banking department. Clients
had lost money because of Security
Trust's ``self-dealing,
conflicts of interest, and breaches of
its fiduciary duties,''
the examiners concluded.
The banking department ordered Security
Trust not to place
funds held in trust into investments in
which the bank or its
officers held an interest. It was also
ordered not to solicit new
clients until further notice.
Seeger didn't respond to numerous phone
messages seeking
comment on the Arizona banking
department's charges.
Rainmaker
Seeger was ``a great rainmaker'' and the
firm in the early
1990s was known ``as a place for non-traditional
retirement
investments,'' said Mark Chester, a
Scottsdale, Arizona, lawyer.
``They were putting money in real
estate, in office buildings,
undeveloped land, in private companies.
You couldn't go to
Merrill Lynch and get that.''
In January, Security Trust converted its
Arizona trust
license to a federal charter, removing
the firm from the state
banking department's oversight. It is
now under the provisional
supervision of the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency.
``We sought and received a national trust
charter because of
the expanding nature of our business,''
said Nancy Murphy, a
Security Trust vice president in an
e-mail. ``Our clients are all
over the U.S. and we feel they are best
served by a trust company
that maintains the rigorous standards
required by a national
charter.''
Security Trust now has 185 employees and
client assets have
grown from $2 billion in 2000 to almost
$13 billion, she said.
The firm no longer manages money, she
added.
Family
Feud
With respect to Spitzer's charges,
Security Trust will hire
an independent consultant to conduct an
investigation, she said
in a telephone interview. ``We may have
made a mistake when we
stepped outside our core retirement business
to deal with a hedge
fund,'' she said.
Seeger, who grew up in Grand Forks, North
Dakota, graduated
from Arizona State University in 1984.
With a classmate named
Hayden K. Holland, he started a
financial consulting business in
1987. Four years later they formed
Security Trust.
In 1992, Seeger persuaded his 71-year-old
aunt to create a
family partnership of her assets, which
he supervised, according
to her subsequent complaint with the
National Association of
Securities Dealers.
She then deposited $479,445 in cash and
securities with
Seeger's firm. Over the next six years,
he invested the money in
risky Mexican securities and
limited-partnership shares that lost
money, the complaint said, adding that
he generated even more
fees by making short-term trades.
Convergent Enters
By March 31, 1998, the accounts contained
$296,075, a 38
percent loss during a period when the
Standard & Poor's 500 index
more than doubled. In 1999, she filed
the complaint against
Seeger; almost two years later, he
agreed to make a payment
without admitting wrongdoing in a
confidential settlement.
``I think Grant has the ethics of a
python,'' said Geoffrey
Fisher, Seeger's cousin and a plaintiff
with his mother in the
case. He declined to discuss the
settlement.
Seeger didn't respond to telephone
requests for comment on
the arbitration matter.
While his arbitration case was underway,
Security Trust was
sold to a Chicago-based private
investment firm. Convergent
Capital Management Inc. paid an
undisclosed price in November
1999 for a majority stake in the
Arizona firm.
Seeger, as chief executive, and William
Kenyon, Security
Trust's president, remained as minority
shareholders. Hayden
Holland, Seeger's original partner,
departed the previous year.
``It was a business divorce,'' said Mark
Chester, the
Scottsdale lawyer who represented
Holland.
Convergent Exits
Kenyon, 57, a former executive vice president
at the
regional Valley Commerce Bank, handles
Security Trust's day-to-
day operations and Seeger focuses on
``strategic alliances and
business development,'' said Murphy.
Kenyon had also worked at Bank One. In his
civil complaint,
Spitzer said Security Trust introduced
Stern to mutual fund
managers at Bank One to further
Canary's trading activities
there. It's not known what role, if
any, Kenyon played in
Security Trust's mutual fund
transactions. He didn't respond to
repeated calls for comment.
Convergent, which had stakes in 12 money management firms
with total assets of $18 billion, sold
most of its holdings for
$49 million in April to City National
Corp., a Los Angeles bank.
Security Trust wasn't part of the
transaction. City National
wanted to expand in money management
and Security Trust's
processing business ``didn't fit the
strategy,'' said Vernon
Kozlen, head of City National's
investment business.
Probes
Convergent's plans to sell its Security
Trust stake have
been put ``on hold'' following
Spitzer's complaint, said William
Ruh, a principal at Castle Creek
Capital LLC, a buyout company
hired to analyze the Arizona firm's
value.
Richard Adler, a former principal at
Convergent, said his
firm is now part of City National and
no longer involved with
Security Trust. He declined further
comment.
Security Trust, to be sure, isn't the only
company whose
mutual fund practices are under
scrutiny, said Barry Barbash, an
attorney and former head of the SEC's
fund oversight division.
``Distribution has always been the sore
thumb,'' he said,
because ``that's where assets are
gathered.'' Still, Barbash
predicted the system will now be
improved. ``Fund companies will
work up some kind of standardized due
diligence process,'' he
said. ``You'll have the SEC looking
hard at intermediaries.''
On his part, Spitzer said the Canary
Capital and Bank of
America cases will have further
consequences. ``This is a wide-
ranging and continuing investigation
which is likely to result in
numerous other charges,'' he said.